Last Updated on March 18, 2024 by Angel Melanson
Much like its parent genres, the โhorror comedyโ has endured huge swaths of time as a beleaguered label despite constantly proving that there are throbbing veins of gold in those haunted hills. Unlike prototypical horror films, however, ones purely concerned with foolery and ghoulery are much easier to dismiss. Horror has functioned as an effective cloak for commentary on everything from bigotry to the dissolution of the family unit to environmentalism and beyond since its inception, but you try to tell someone about Return of the Killer Tomatoesโ hilarious in-film commercial to fund the rest of the movie as a comment on capitalism, and theyโll laugh you out of the pizzeria.
You know what? Theyโre not wrong! At the end of the day, if a horror comedy made you laugh and conjured up some spooky horror-adjacent vibes for you, it did a good job. Often, thatโs about as much as the filmmakers set out to do.
Hereโs where I rush back in to make a case, though. Even when theyโre hits, horror comedies are still derided, or, at best, patted on the head then sent on their way. When The New York Times reviewed the immaculate The Return of the Living Dead in 1985, critic Stephen Holden noted โ[itโs] by no means the ultimate horror movie it aspires to be. The volume of stagy gore quickly reaches a point of diminishing returns. And rather than trying to sustain a mood of grim suspense, the writer-director Dan O'Bannon has conceived this cinematic cousin of โNight of the Living Deadโ as a mordant punk comedy.โ Instead of noting how well these (very intentional) tones worked together, itโs dismissed as failing at something it never tried to be: a cut and dry horror flick. As great a phrase as โmordant punk comedyโ is, itโs not used here as a compliment, and thatโs ridiculous.
Part of the issue is that, as both genres and human conditions, horror and comedy give off the misconception that theyโre easy to interpret and render without much effort. Ever gasp at a jump scare? Bam, horror! Ever laugh at a dumb joke or a guy falling on his ass? Pad that out to 90 minutes and you got yourself a motion picture! Itโs easier to mime than to mine when it comes to digging into why things make people react the way they do, and that always bears out when it comes time to portray those reactions onscreen.
Comedies and horror films are often burdened by their authenticity being buried by a veneer of inauthenticity. Truly funny people and those who deeply respect and understand horror (and, god forbid, those who live with both in their hearts) are quick to use jokes and allegories to talk about real, painful topics. Hell, even when theyโre not, getting a genuine laugh out of someone is one of those warm little rare gifts of humanity we have far too few of. Making thousands of people laugh over years and years is a monumental achievement, something that becomes its own heirloom, as weโve now seen generations hand Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein down their family tree. The craft in making these incongruous genres work together should be enjoyed like it was candy, but itโd be nice if it was recognized as the artisanal imported stuff rather than handfuls of reformed corn syrup.
Unfortunately, much like canisters of Trioxin-ridden bodies, we sure do have more than enough barrels of the cheap, crummy, contemptuous stuff. Every rose has its thorn, and for every What We Do in the Shadows, thereโs a Vampires Suck. Both these films would be in the same section at a video store, but there couldnโt be a bigger gulf of difference between the pitch-perfect mockumentary dry humor of the former and the rank, hateful, reference glut of the Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer venture. Most audiences arenโt exactly eager to dig deeper into a subgenre once burned, however, and thatโs always been an uphill battle for this intrepid but uneven species of movie. Someone put off by the excessively horny Stan Helsing may decide to skip the silly brilliance of Tucker & Dale vs Evil. Sure, theyโre only cheating themselves, but itโs hard to blame them.
The enormous success of 2000โs Scream-skewering Scary Movie (it made over 10 times its $19 million dollar budget theatrically worldwide) proved that the right material at the right time can have a real pop cultural impact. Unfortunately, it also begat a flock of increasingly uninspired sequels and helped encourage a village of straight-to-DVD/VOD pretenders that positively radiated derision for its viewers.
The original Scary Movie also served as a fork in the road for the subgenre. The franchise always made its money back and then some, but as CGI became cheaper and more accessible and the box office returns served up ever-shrinking portions, it became clear that pouring tens of millions of dollars into these spoofs wasnโt exactly necessary any longer.
Looking at the opening of 2006โs Scary Movie 4, its Saw take-off is constructed exclusively of first draft jokes, but there is something undeniably compelling about the baffling trash pop culture thrill of seeing Dr. Phil and Shaquille O'Neal yell at each other in that iconic, limb-surrendering room. The bummer is that it doesnโt deliver beyond the first few seconds of recognition. With mid-to-low-tier spoofs, not only is the opportunity there to get really subversive, but itโs also pretty much a necessity for it to work as a comedy film. The marquee names and references do all the work of getting the butts into seats; now you can get weird on the audience. When itโs instead pulled back into being just a faint allusion to whatโs supposedly being wickedly lampooned (usually just the beats shared in trailers so everyone will โget itโ), itโs letting the audience know that the filmmakers/studio committee think weโre a bunch of jerk simpletons who wouldnโt be able to handle a new Airplane.
Friedberg and Seltzer and their like arenโt ripe for reexamination, and they never will be. Their parodies had their โBest Byโ date scratched off before they hit theaters. As time passes and their clunky pop culture references age completely out of public consciousness, thereโs an ever-thickening miasma of inscrutability covering the lazy gags that were once merely cynical, soulless, clunky and unforgivably unfunny. They all play out like hostile space aliens putting on a hateful community theater production of every reason why our planet deserves to be destroyed right before they do it. We plead that their grotesque production contains no true sense of how humans have ever actually processed humor or displayed basic common decency, please, let us show you Little Shop of Horrors! Then the aliens look down at us and whisper โnoโ before putting on blindfolds from Bird Box and blowing us up with farts or something.
Itโs not unfair to compare expectations between horror spoofs and wholly original horror comedies, at least not in a world that contains Mel Brooksโ astonishing Young Frankenstein.
Young Frankenstein managed to attach itself to the same wavelength that helped make Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein so successful. A & C didnโt need hindsight to know that, while the actual tropes Universal monster movies trod so well were pretty easy to make fun of, it was much funnier and more entertaining to make fun with them. Taking the time to mimic James Whaleโs love of fully fleshed out side characters and Tod Browning's atmosphere-ripening establishing shots sold the jokes like hotcakes and managed to sneak in its own effective gothic short film between the wisecracks and sight gags.
Bad horror comedies know theyโre bad about 99% of the time, and they seem to radiate that resentment onto the audience. (I imagine them spitting out between cigar chomps, โMake โem suffer in the cheap seats as much as we suffered in the editing room!โ) Great horror comedies know theyโre throwing a killer party, and theyโre gracious hosts. Their attention to detail is why they remain fun, itโs why they endure, and thatโs why I can still put on Shaun of the Dead any day of the week.
Of course, horror comedies are not all created equal, but to be fair, thatโs often because they donโt exactly all have common goals. 1983โs Hysterical or 1982โs Pandemonium arenโt silly cheese fests only because they pale in comparison to the big-budget grandeur of the glamorously absurd Dean Cundey-lensed Death Becomes Her from 1992; theyโre just coming from different sides of the street. Much as itโd be silly to compare a hamburger stand to a Michelin star-winning sushi restaurant, so too should we avoid comparing the โHouse of Bad Piesโ to Treeโs fantastic โGroundhog Day from hellโ montage from Happy Death Day. Just because somethingโs goofy doesnโt automatically mean itโs not sincere, and itโs a big enough party to welcome everyone whoโs showing up in earnest.
All that said, the subgenre has rehabbed its reputation admirably over the past handful of years. Tragedy Girls, The Final Girls, Extra Ordinary, The Happy Death Day films, Scare Me, Freakyโฆ every year weโre getting spoiled with authentically well-made and entertaining horror comedies, and even โstraightโ horror films with a wicked sense of dark humor are all the rage. A big reason for such an effective balance is the inclusion of women as real main characters instead of using them merely as sexy or humiliated props. Young Frankenstein not only had the gift of a cast including Cloris Leachman, Madeline Kahn and Teri Garr, but Mel Brooks also trusted their instincts, and their improv created some of the funniest moments of the film. Imagine that train scene without Kahnโs Elizabeth ducking Dr. Frederick Frankensteinโs blown kiss!
This truth was gloriously cemented back in 1988โs Elvira: Mistress of the Dark. Tragically slept on during its theatrical release (the distribution studio closing immediately before its release damned it before it even got a chance), itโs rightfully found an appreciative audience over the years thanks to home video and streaming. Cassandra Peterson mixed her horror hostโs iconic sex appeal, Valley Girl delivery and Groundlings-honed comedic timing to surprisingly wholesome results. From magic talismans to food demon puppets to a punk rock dog makeover, itโs the best of Americaโs 1980sโ pop culture kept pristine in an airtight, neon-lit time capsule that remains as fresh as Elvira herself.
So, it took us longer than it should have to realize that, much like everything else, giving money to a diverse group of passionate, talented people will produce something a lot more meaningful and joyful than a misanthropic jumble of trendy, mean-spirited quotations. Imagine! All we can do now is appreciate them while theyโre fresh releases and still celebrate the classics to make sure we donโt backslide into the Paranormal Activity parody universe. Just as the sins of the father shouldnโt be visited upon the son, neither should we let the blot of lazy garbage taint the gems weโve been given over the years. Horror comedyโs had an uphill battle, one thatโs as varied as it is weird. If you still canโt find any love in your heart for gory goof-em-ups, then please, at the very least, donโt make one yourself.

