When I pick up the phone and call a friend from home, thereโs regularly the same routine. โI didnโt recognize the number, but then I rememberedโyou still have a landline.โ
Damn right I do and, while it may seem like a needless expense, should I ever find myself in a situation like Danielle Deadwyler does in the new Blumhouse horror picture The Woman in the Yard, Iโll suffer none of her woes. The minute I am faced with an eerily existential threat looming outside of my metaphorically half-remodeled farmhouse, Iโll be able to call the policeโand thatโs even if my all-consuming grief has left me unable to pay the electric bill or put gas in the car, thus nixing any method of charging up my powerless cell phone.
This is the predicament Deadwylerโs Ramona finds herself in at the top of Jaume Collet-Serraโs kinda-dopey-but-weirdly-effective new film. We meet her mid-bed rot, draining that phoneโs battery watching a video of someone we quickly deduce is (or was) her husband. When she finally gets up with a leg in an elaborate brace and mutters โplease give me strength,โ itโs easy to deduce that she is the lone survivor of a recent accident. Yet there are still two childrenโTay (Peyton Jackson), still in his early teens but old enough to be stepping toward defiance, and adorable moppet Annie (Estella Kahiha)โthat both need mothering.
The morning routine is hampered at first by a lack of electricity (but for some reason Ramona says it will โcome backโ tonight, which makes no sense) but then gets weird when a woman draped in thin billowy fabric shows up and looms outside the kitchen window. This figure soon presents itself to be some sort of supernatural and malicious force. (The dog barking like crazy is our first clue.) Rotten time to be on crutches with no working phone!
While Sam Stefanakโs script is written with a near-preternatural lack of originality, The Woman in the Yard succeeds (somewhat) due to Deadwylerโs sympathetic performance and Collet-Serraโs knack for sharp camera placement, evocative lighting and the occasional show-off camera move. (With this and the recent airport-set Netflix thriller Carry-On, the director of Orphan and The Shallows is back on sturdier footing than with his disastrous attempt at a superhero film, Black Adam.) Sure, there are some cheap jump scares and unexplained visions that come out of nowhere accompanied by a loud noise, but they are at least done pretty well.
I am not going to bother explaining what the titular woman represents (if youโve seen any horror movie post-Babadook you can probably figure it out) but I canโt deny that The Woman in the Yard has a pretty lazy attitude toward explaining or even showcasing its inner logic. A supernatural or fantasy film can only work when we know its rules. Unless I completely zoned out for a bit, which is unlikely considering the 87-minute running time, I have no idea how Ramona discovered that only if a room was โcompletely darkโ would it be safe from the being that possessed malevolent powers.
Indeed, once the first hourโa pretty taut exercise in tensionโgives way to action, the film becomes an avalanche of โand now some crazy stuff is gonnaโ happen.โ Thereโs a lot of running and weird visions and stepping into different realitiesโa real โthrow it all against the wallโ approach. Much of it looks cool, but the haphazard storytelling quickly becomes a little irritating, not to mention confusing. No lie, I would not be surprised if I soon got an email from the studio apologizing that the reels were out of order during the press screening. (Said press screening happening several hours after the movie opened to the general publicโrarely a good sign!)
Still, despite the baffling third act and one of those final moments that make you shout โwait, what?!?!โ Iโm still somewhat pro on The Woman in the Yard. Danielle Deadwyler, an executive producer on the project, is a real tour-de-force in this, and milks her scenes of desperation and despair for all they are worth. This is a movie loaded with shortcuts but sheโs not taking any of them.

