Review: CHILDREN OF THE CORN (2009)

An archive review from The Gingold Files.

Editor's Note: This was originally published for FANGORIA on September 27, 2009, and we're proud to share it as part of The Gingold Files.


One of the motivations for writer/director/producer Donald P. Borchers to do the Children of the Corn remake that just aired on Syfy was to create an adaptation that was more faithful to Stephen Kingโ€™s chilling short story than the one he produced back in 1984. But the movieโ€™s DVD (coming from Anchor Bay) reveals another reason: This film is a Statement as well.

In an on-camera interview, Borchers proclaims that he wanted this interpretation of Kingโ€™s tale of a youthful rural cult to be a parable about religious extremism and the current crisis in the Middle East. This is no doubt why the new Children (following a 1963-set prologue) takes place in 1975, so that protagonist Burt (David Anders) can be a Vietnam veteran, a key source of the tension between him and wife Vicky (Kandyse McClure) during their drive through the Nebraska farmlands. (The fact that theyโ€™re interracially married, which might be expected to have also caused some problems in middle America in those days, is never addressed.) Thereโ€™s lots of forced, on-the-nose dialogue regarding Burtโ€™s Nam experiences, and when heโ€™s later being pursued by the killer kids through the cornfields, Borchers actually throws a bunch of Viet Cong, machine-gun fire and tracer bullets into the sequence.

You can probably surmise at this point that the 2009 Children is not an improvement on the 1984 version, which certainly left room for it: That film featured two of the dumbest protagonists in horror history, wasted veteran actor R.G. Armstrong as a clichรฉ-spouting (โ€œItโ€™s just the wind!โ€) rube and, sorry, but John Franklinโ€™s squeaky-voiced turn as corn cult leader Isaac always struck me as more goofy than scary. The redux stays truer to King by making its central couple a dysfunctional one, but Vickyโ€™s constant haranguing of Burt gets really old really fast, which doesnโ€™t exactly help maintain sympathy for her. Nor does the fact that she seems incapable of seeing the young stalkers even when theyโ€™re strolling or running one at a time past their car. At least the original Burtโ€™s dialogue howler, after he runs down a young boy who proves to have had his throat slashed (โ€œHe was already dead when he stumbled out into the roadโ€), has been improved to โ€œHe was as good as dead when I hit himโ€โ€”but Children โ€™09 tops it when Burt later asks the little cultists, โ€œWhy donโ€™t you put that in your God and smoke it?โ€

Like the โ€™84 feature, this one defuses the tension and mystery of Kingโ€™s story by revealing the kidsโ€™ evil right up front, though Borchers doesnโ€™t bother to actually show us their massacre of the adults in his opening scene, just the stabbing of a pig. His Children of the Corn are cast more age-appropriately than their big-screen predecessors, but the new Isaac (Preston Bailey, who plays Cody on Dexter) comes off as more petulant than possessed of an unholy spirit. He also wears an oversized hat that, when heโ€™s photographed from behind, makes him look a bit like Spaceballsโ€™ Dark Helmet. While Borchers retains Kingโ€™s ending this time around, the climactic action is intercut with a ridiculously gratuitous sex scene between two of the older teenaged Childrenโ€”itโ€™s the โ€œtime of fertilization,โ€ you seeโ€”and when He Who Walks Behind the Rows finally makes His presence known, weโ€™re never even given a look at Him.

The โ€œuncut and uncensoredโ€ version contained on the DVD doesnโ€™t add much gore to the one shown on Syfyโ€”the extra explicitness is more evident in that bout of fornicationโ€”and it looks and sounds sharp enough in the widescreen transfer. The movie is accompanied by the 45-minute โ€œRough Cuts: Remaking Children of the Corn,โ€ divided into four parts. โ€œNew Directionsโ€ is where Borchers announces his intentions to make this film a political allegory, and to improve on the โ€œHollywoodizedโ€ original (whose writer and director he gallantly fails to name, acting as if he was its sole creative force), which King disapproved of. One has to wonder what the Maine man will think of this interpretation, on which he shares a writing credit with Borchersโ€”who admits that King declined to read his new script, a revision of the authorโ€™s initial โ€™84 draft.

โ€œCast of the Cornโ€ sees Anders discussing details of Burtโ€™s backstory and McClure addressing elements of the social climate of the โ€™70s, which sound interesting, and itโ€™s a shame theyโ€™re not more evident in the movie itself. In โ€œTo Live and Die in Gatlin,โ€ production designer Andrew Hussey and Alan Tuskes, on-set supervisor for Robert Kurtzmanโ€™s makeup FX company, share interesting details about the challenges of shooting in real cornfields and creating appliances for then-uncast young characters, respectively. โ€œFly on the Wallโ€ is a collection of on-set footage from a few key momentsโ€”though the best behind-the-scenes bit appears in โ€œTo Live and Die,โ€ when the juvenile actors are seen returning their weapons to a prop box at the end of the dayโ€™s shooting. Too bad that, on screen, these kiddie killers have nothing on the terror tots of the recent The Children or Orphanโ€™s Esther (played by Isabelle Fuhrman, whoโ€™s on hand here too, but only as an โ€œAdditional Voiceโ€; bet the filmmakers are kicking themselves over that one now). Both of those movies also DVDebut next month, and either one is a better bet than this Corn ball.