Last Updated on July 14, 2024 by FANGORIA Staff
Hollywoodโs gonna Hollywoodโand sometimes that means looking at the gruesome, pervy, or just plain depressing ending of a to-be-adapted horror novel and asking the $64,000 question: โWhat if we made this happy?โ Or, if not happy, at least more palatable to a general audience, even if that general audience has paid to see a horror movie. Sigh. Here are ten horror movies that took their source materialโs ending and threw it out with the bathwater, for better or worse. (OK, for โitโs a little less dark, but I understand the reasoningโ or โwhat in the hell did you do?โ)

The Bad Seed
In the character of eight-year-old Rhonda Penmark (Patty McCormack), 1956โs The Bad Seed gave us one of the earliestโand bestโentries in the Killer Kid sub-genre. โBest,โ that is, right up until the last scene, when the brewing conflict between angelic, smart, multiple murderess pre-teen Rhoda and her increasingly suspicious mother Christine (Nancy Kelly) comes to a headโฆ. with Rhoda getting struck and killed by a lightning bolt. Bam. Problem solved. Good on ya, God, for the last-minute play, I guess.
The original book, written by William March, ended in a much more downbeat and morally complex way. Christine gives her daughter an overdose of sleeping pills and then commits suicide, destroying all the evidence of Rhondaโs homicidal tendencies beforehand so no one need know of her familyโs shame. A serviceable plan for the put-upon movie matriarch, except a neighbor finds an unconscious Rhoda soon enough for her life to be saved, leaving her free to kill again with no one the wiser.

The Devilโs Advocate
The film version of The Devilโs Advocate goes for a punk-out ending, segueing from an epic fifteen minutes of โJohn Miltonโ (aka Satan), played by Al Pacino, going absolutely ham on main character Kevin (Keanu Reeves)…. to a flashback to the beginning of the movie, revealing thatโwhaddayaknowโKevinโs seduction to the dark side was actually a dream. A premonition. An alternate reality. Something. The movie ends with everything hunky-dory for Keanu Reeves, except that Satanโs going to keep trying to seduce him, because heโs Keanu and who doesnโt like Keanu?
Andrew Neidermanโs book doesnโt have the raw, savage WTF-ery of Al Pacinoโs scene-chewing, but it does make a lot more sense. In the book, Kevin figures out pretty early on that there are some supernatural shenanigans afoot with Milton and, with the help of two book-exclusive characters, comes up with a test (ARE YOU SATAN?: pink line for yes, blue line for no) that ends up killing him. Except, of course, Milton isnโt really dead: it was all a ruse to land Kevin in prison, whereโunder the direction of (guess who?) Milton, whoโs adopted the guise of a prisonerโhe can use his legal knowledge to help assorted rapists and murderers get out on appeal.

Pin
About a decade before The Devilโs Advocate came out, another one of Andrew Neidermanโs books, Pin, was adapted for the big screen by Canadian director Sandor Stern. As was not the case with The Devilโs Advocate, book and movie hew pretty closely together here, at least until the last few minutes. An already mentally fragile teenage boy, Leon (David Hewlett), is left even more psychologically adrift when his parents die in a car crash, leaving him increasingly obsessed with his one friend: Pin, his late fatherโs anatomy doll, whom Leon is convinced is alive.
One way the movie is different from the book is that it way downplays Leonโs psychosexual obsession with his twin sister, Ursula. (Neiderman went on to ghostwrite for Flowers in the Attic author V.C. Andrews after she passed. Go figure.) In the movie, Leon tries to kill Ursulaโs boyfriend, Stan, and Ursula retaliates by chopping up Pin with an axe. Leon snaps and essentially turns into Pin, trapped inside his own body and unable to move or speak. In the final scene, long-suffering Ursula finally gets her happy ending: A nurse is taking care of Leon, leaving Ursula free to go on vacations with Stan (heโs alive!) and, I dunno, blow-dry her hair, which I assume is what โ80s horror heroines spent half their time doing. In the book (youโll never see this one coming), Leon does kill Stan and, once Ursula chops up Pin, goes into a catatonic state; itโs an enraged, traumatized Ursula whoโs key in Leonโs transformation into Pin, essentially as punishment. The epilogue shows us that, far from escaping her brother and living her life, a not-entirely-sane Ursula is now Leonโs caretaker, treating him like Pin and occasionally behaving sexually towards him.

Mr. Sardonicus
The William Castle classic Mr. Sardonicus is based on the novella Sardonicus by Ray Russell, who adapted his own story for the screen. The film, directed by famous schtick-master William Castle, famously polls its audience to decide whether the evil Sardonicusโwho ends the movie unable to open his mouth, thus doomed to starvationโdeserves punishment or mercy. The punishment ending is assumed, but in the novella, weโre actually told what happens to Sardonicus: he does in fact, starve to death, but not before his servants abandon him, leaving him to wander the countryside โlivid and emaciated, his mind shattered, mutely imploring the succor of even the lowliest beggarsโฆ. Cursed by Lucifer, they say, he thirsted and starved in the midst of plenty, surrounded by kegs of drink and tables full of the choicest viands, suffering the tortures of Tantalus, until he finally died.โ
Not that Sardoincus didnโt deserve it; he really was a son of a bitch. In another change, the movie has Sardonicus secure the main characterโs help by threatening to facially disfigure Sardonicusโ own wife, whom the main character loves. In the novella, the wife is threatened with rape, โand not for one fleeting hour, but every day and every night of her life, whensoever I say, in whatsoever manner I choose to express my conjugal privilege!…. I am by nature imaginative.โ Yeah. Kill โim.

Motherโs Boys
The Bad Seed may be about a sociopathic child vs. a sociopathic mother, but they have in common bogus endings that sweep away the impact of their source booksโ original endings by up and killing their main antagonists. Motherโs Boys, co-starring Jamie Lee Curtis as a woman determined to get back into her estranged familyโs life, by hook or by crook, has an ending thatโs at least less galling than The Bad Seed literally having its baddie struck down by lightning: Jude (Curtis) dies accidentally after unsuccessfully trying to get her two young kids to kill Dadโs new girlfriend.
The book, by Bernard Taylor, has a biggerโand a differentโbody count, leading to a whopper of an ending. Here, there are three boys, plus an eight-year-old sister, Daisy. Daisy tries to rescue her fatherโs tied-up girlfriend from her brothers, the oldest of whomโringleader Kesterโretaliates and accidentally kills her. Kester then kills the girlfriend with an axe, and the boys bury her body. Dad comes home and finds out what happened, prompting the normally sensitive, nine-year-old Benโterrified of going to jail and being separated from his brothersโto murder him with an axe. The boys are ready to go live with their beloved motherโฆ who, in a coup de grace, has gotten over her whole โloving motherโ phase and no longer wants to see her kids. The book ends with the three young boysโmurderers, nowโrejected and alone.

Carrie
The ending of Carrie is less defanged in Brian De Palmaโs film adaptation than stripped downโthe film ending, in which Carrie White kills her mother and sets her house on fire, resulting in her own death, isnโt exactly happy-go-lucky. One has to imagine that alterations to Kingโs original source material are less about wanting to shy away from gruesome material than an issue of budget. It would have cost a lot of clams to do justice to Book Carrieโs night-long murder spree, where she departs the prom and proceeds to go hog-wild on the town of Chamberlain, setting fires and igniting explosions aโplenty, killing hundreds of people before dying of a fatal wound inflicted by her now-dead mother.

Cujo
Cujo is about much more than a killer St. Bernard. In his depiction of two families caught in Cujoโs orbitโthe blue-collar Cambers, who own Cujo, and the middle-class Trenton family, who he terrorizesโKing paints a disquieting portrait of the male ego and the position of the man in protecting and providing for (or failing to protect and provide for) his family. Abusive Joe Camber is the โbeastโ who makes his wife and childโs life hell, while Vic Trentonโflailing professionally and in his marriageโis out of town when his wife and young child are trapped in a broken-down car with a bloodthirsty, rabid dog right outside the door. Itโs a pretty big change to Kingโs story, then, not just the text but the meaning, that in the original book, the kid actually dies, succumbing to dehydration and sunstroke right before he and his mother would have been rescued. The Hollywood version of Cujo has a, well, Hollywood ending, with Donna Trenton getting her son to the safety of the nearby house and managing to revive him before Vic shows up, reuniting the happy nuclear family.

Thinner
Hey, there have been a lot of Stephen King adaptations; there are going to be a lot of changed movie endings. Whether the ending of the movie version of Thriller is โdefangedโ depends on your point of view. Both versions of Thinner wrap up with small-town attorney Billy Halleck cured of the curse that was causing him to rapidly waste away, on one condition; the curse has been transferred to a pie, which someone else must eat, or the curse will bounce back on him. In both the movie and the novel, Billy successfully lures his wife into eating the pie, only to discover that her beloved daughter has eaten a slice, too. Book Billy decides to eat a slice himself, following his family into death. There, the novel ends. In the movie, Billy is about to eat a slice but is interrupted by a family friend with whom he believes his wife was having an affair; rather than commit suicide, he invites the man in for a slice of pie. Remorseful man kills himself vs. remorseful man, spurred by vengeance, does a heel turn, and tallies another notch on the murder beltโฆ itโs a point-of-view thing as to which is more grim. If the movie version of Thinner does have a darker ending than its source material, itโs not exactly the only King-based movie to fit that criteria.

Deadly Friend
1986โs Deadly Friend is mostly known for the scene where Kristy Swanson throws a basketball at Anne Ramseyโs head, causing it to explode into a splatter of bright red goo. A classic scene! One, though, that didnโt appear in Diana Henstellโs book, which is overall much more downbeat than its adaptation. (Hard not to beโฆ. see: โexploding headโ) At the end of the movie, teenage-girl-turned-killer-robot Sam (Swanson) kills her friend/creator Paul (Matthew Laborteaux) by snapping his neck. In the book, Paul manages to defeat Sam by throwing her into a freezing river. Immediately afterward, wracked with guilt and grief over what has become of the girl he loves, he commits suicide by jumping into the river himself as his horrified father looks on. (The book ends thusly: โThen, in one soaring swoop, he flew out after her through empty space and thought with blinding clarity as he fell: So this is what love comes to.โ)
To make it even more depressing: In the movie, Sam and Paul are in their mid-teens, and Laborteaux, at least, looks a good few years older than his characterโs supposed to be. In the book, Sam and Paul are twelve and thirteen, respectively, when they die.

I Am Legend
The 2007 film version of I Am Legend didnโt change the ending of Richard Mathesonโs original novel so much as changed the whole damn thing, rendering the two more or less entirely different except for the basics. (The most fundamental difference between the two is that the book is excellent and the movie is not.) Itโs in the ending, however, that the adaptation turns most egregious. In both versions, Robert Neville isโas far as he knowsโthe last human being alive on earth following the outbreak of a vampire apocalypse. Book Robert does scientific experiments to try and discover the cause of the disease, while Movie Robert (Will Smith) is busy at work trying to develop a cure. Heโs successful in finding not only a cure but two human survivors, who are able to spirit the cure away to a military base following Robertโs heroicโlegendaryโsacrifice of his own life.
So: Robertโs a legend because he saved humankind. In the bookโฆ nah. The infecteds, he finds out, have evolved to the point where theyโve developed a medicine that can alleviate some of their symptoms, allowing them to begin the process of creating a new society. Heโs a legend to the vampires because heโs killed so many of themโa kind of boogeyman, a monster-under-the-bed to this newborn species whom he thought of as irredeemably monstrous. Heโs a relicโฆ the last relic, in fact, of humanity, after he kills himself with suicide pills rather than face public execution. In the movie, humankind is saved. In the book, humankind dies.

