• Bokeem Woodbine Rides with the “DEVIL”

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 15:51:48 by Samuel Zimmerman

    This Friday, DEVIL, the Dowdle Brothers follow-up to QUARANTINE and THE POUGHKEEPSIE TAPES, will be unleashed in theaters under M. Night Shyamalan’s Night Chronicles banner. While relatively little is known, the plot revolves around five strangers caught in an elevator, with one of them not exactly who they say they are. Actor Bokeem Woodbine (BLACK DYNAMITE, THE BREED, DEAD PRESIDENTS) essays one such stranger and spoke to Fango about the film, his role and why people just may be wrong about Shyamalan.

    FANGORIA: When you were first cast in DEVIL, were you told from the outset it would all be heavily kept underwraps? Is it hard containing all of that?

    BOKEEM WOODBINE: I had to sign a non-disclosure for the first time in my career so that was an indicator that maybe this was something special and to this day my tongue is held. It’s not hard keeping the secret. The challenge is in wanting people to know. I want people to see what happens and I want people to be excited by the twists and turns. The challenging part is waiting to go into the theater with my baseball cap and sitting in the back and seeing how the fans react. That’s hard. 

    FANG: Do you think people will be genuinely surprised by the movie?

    WOODBINE: People are going to be floored. I don’t think anybody’s gonna get it until it’s revealed. That’s one of the most exciting parts of the picture. It’s a total mystery and I’ve seen some cuts of it, and even though I know what’s going to happen, I’m still surprised.

    FANG: This is the first film we’re seeing from the Dowdles that’s non-POV or first person. How do you think they handled themselves with a more traditional narrative? Were you comfortable in their hands? 

    WOODBINE: One of the many great things about working with the Dowdles is that they give you an indie feel. They give you a sense that you actually have a say in the production. They make you feel like you’re part of the moviemaking process and not just a prop to be put here and there like a lot of directors. They totally respect actors, they respect what we do and they definitely made us feel included. It was like a team effort, so it was almost like working on an indie picture but with money. It was amazing because they’re not going to take all your suggestions. Some stuff, they’ll shoot it right down, but some of my lines were completely ad-libbed and I didn’t think they would make the cut, and then I’m watching a cut and some of the things I said off the top of my head were in the movie. It made me feel part of the creative process, and I feel like I was part of the movie in the sense that I felt like I was part of DEAD PRESIDENTS or POKER HOUSE or some of the other more independent stuff that I’ve done where even after it’s shot, years later, I still feel like it’s my movie. I was part of that. And I don’t feel like that with everything, but I feel like that with DEVIL.

    FANG: Are you a fan of horror and genre films? 

    WOODBINE: You know what, I’m not. I’m just going to be honest and put that on the table. I like to see the art of say, Sam Raimi. He’s an artist, but not everybody’s an artist. A lot of these cats get a little bit of change and they just want to chop off arms and legs. But there’s an art to that, and a cat like Sam Raimi is an artist. I’ll watch any movie he does. But a lot of the newer generation, they just don’t do it for me. Horror at its best is John Carpenter, Sam Raimi. Alfred Hitchcock did some horrifying shit, that’s horror, the fear of not necessarily the unknown, but the fear of the known. PSYCHO, you know what’s coming. That’s some scary shit. He’s stabbing you while you’re in the shower. That’s you at your most vulnerable; that, or using the restroom, or having sex. Nowadays, a lot of these cats don’t understand how to scare people. They think you throw a lot of blood around, you got a nice effect with somebody’s head coming off…it isn’t real horror to me. I defer to the old school. 

    FANG: So what was it about DEVIL that grabbed you? 

    WOODBINE: The psychology. The psychology behind the concept of five people who would never normally interact with each other, who are forced to not only interact but try to get through this harrowing experience. That blew me away, and that has to do in part with growing up in New York and then moving to Los Angeles and the juxtaposition between the two worlds and trying to make sense of Los Angeles. Everybody stays in their cars, it’s a very socially disparate place; this culture stays in this neighborhood, that culture stays in their neighborhood. That’s not how I grew up. I grew up in more of a mixture. So thinking about five people who wouldn’t necessarily interact under normal circumstances and are forced to, that really appealed to me because of my experiences living in LA where everything’s so separated. 

    FANG: The characters in the film are the opposite of separated. What was it like shooting in that tight of a space? 

    WOODBINE: It was challenging because the locale was the same everyday. I’m used to set changes and location moves and for this picture, I knew where I was going to be everyday. What made it easier was the cast. I would work with anybody in this cast again, in an instant. Be it Geoffrey [Arend], Bojana [Novakovic], Logan [Marshall-Green], Jenny [O’Hara]. I’d work with any of them in a heartbeat. Not only did they bring their A-game, but they’re very likeable people. And when you’re in a situation like that, a tight space, it pays to wear deodorant, no [laughs], it pays to be with people who are likeable and I like all of them. Even though it was challenging, it was a little bit easier because of who I was in the elevator with. 

    FANG: What was the technical setup of the elevator between you five, crew and camera? 

    WOODBINE: It was a lot of moving walls, it was a lot of no ceilings and we had a great DP in Tak Fujimoto. He is way ahead of his time. He found ways to get the camera in there. There were certain setups where I’d come to set and be like, “That’s where you’re putting the camera, Tak?!” When you see it, you’ll see. He got some crazy angles out of that. They made it work. 

    FANG: You’ve likened some of the film to your experience moving across the country and the idea of unexpected interactions. Does some of the film have to do with getting five people who wouldn’t normally interact, and this Devil turning them on each other through their differences? 

    WOODBINE: What’s so interesting about this picture is that they showed in reality when there’s a crisis situation, a lot of that shit goes out the window. They never dwell too much on the fact that they have a young woman, a white man, a cat of mixed origin, a black man and an older woman. They never really emphasize it because if something were to happen right now and the ground were to fall out, if I could help you out, I’d help you out and I’d like to think the same of you. I would never stop to think, “Oh, this cat is from wherever.” I would just be, “Oh, he needs a helping hand.” It’s only the most ignorant that cling to their brainwashed ways, or their racism, or sexism, or whatever their –ism is. I’ve been in situations with strangers where they don’t care what color you are, they just try to help you out. So the movie actually highlighted that the problems never really come from that, they come from whatever’s going on. 

    FANG: That’s nice to hear because often those things can feel lazy because it’s just an easy point of conflict. 

    WOODBINE: Absolutely, I think the Dowdles and M. Night had a lot to do with that. 

    FANG: Can you talk a bit about Shyamalan’s involvement on the film and the interactions you had with him? 

    WOODBINE: M. Night was one of those producers who was a gracious host. A lot of times, a producer comes on set, you’ll see actors like roaches scurrying back to their trailers. Nobody wants to hang out with the producer. You never know what they’re going to say or what’s going to happen when they come on the set. It was the opposite with M. Night. He set the tone early on because not only did he get everybody together and hang out on a social level, but he also took the time to talk to each one of us individually and say, “This is what I’m looking for.” In my experience, because I don’t know what anybody else’s was, in the conversation we had he said, “Look, you could fake this, you’re a charming guy, you’ve got charisma, you could pretty much walk through this if you want to but if you try that, I’m gonna know and I’m gonna call you on it and that’s not a good thing. I need you to bring your A-game.” I was planning on bringing my A-game anyway, but when you get in a room and it’s just you and M. Night and he tells you to bring your A-game, you’re gonna do it. So that was my interaction with him and it wasn’t out of the ordinary for him to give a call a couple of times throughout the shooting and just be like, “Hey, I’ve been watching the dailies, you’re not being lazy, keep it up.” He was a benevolent dictator.

    FANG: Do you feel you’re prone to laziness if not pushed?

    WOODBINE: Never, the thing is, only certain directors care enough. You can fool anybody. I’ve worked on some pictures where I didn’t necessarily love the character, I didn’t necessarily love the project as a whole but I had to pay bills and those are the kind of pictures that ultimately, you’re not that crazy about. But when you have a good director who cares about his project, he cares about his project even more than you care about your role, and those are the directors that’ll push you to find those things that you normally wouldn’t. I don’t consider myself lazy. I consider myself very hard working but sometimes a little under challenged. So it takes your Forest Whitaker, or the Hughes Brothers or the Dowdles, or M. Night, or a David Mamet script, or a Taylor Hackford, or the late Ted Demme. Even Michael Bay will bring some stuff out of you if you listen to him. It takes a certain director to pay enough attention because sometimes you don’t even know that you’re taking it easy on yourself. You might think that you’re bringing 100 percent but it takes a director who really cares about his project to look at you and look at his vision and say, “You know what, you’ve got to go deeper.” And I imagine it’s a hard thing for them to do because they’re chasing the light, they’ve got a certain amount of film they can and can’t shoot, but the ones who really care will find a way to get the best performance out of you. 

    FANG: Did the tension of the film and the tight space ever spill over into real life between you and your co-stars? 

    WOODBINE: Man, we all dug each other so much it was disgusting, and they’re going to tell you the same thing. We got along too well. It was gross. There was never any tension, it was more like, I got your back, you got my back and even if there are times when we might be at odds with each other, it never comes into real life. It’s so corny, but we were very caring of one another. Whatever tension exists on screen, as soon as they said cut, it was gone. 

    FANG: Currently, Shyamalan’s reputation kind of precedes himself. Are you worried about that hurting the film in any way? 

    WOODBINE: I never thought about that to tell you the truth. When you make a picture, it’s going to be what it is. It’s out of my hands at this point. I don’t think it will affect this film negatively because—and I’m not saying this because I’m in it—this is a really dynamite picture. I’ve been in a couple of pictures and this one is really, really good. If anything, anyone who might have something negative to say about Night, they’re going to have to eat their words. I hate to say it, but there’s going to be a lot of people who have to swallow their pride and just give it up because we brought the business with this one. 

    {jcomments on}

    Read more »
  • “DISTURBIA” screenwriter has “GOOSEBUMPS”

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 15:12:33 by Allan Dart

    R.L. Stine’s popular kids’ horror book series is being turned into a feature film by the scribe who co-wrote both the LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT and RED DAWN remakes.

    Risky Business reports that Carl Ellsworth (who also penned Wes Craven’s RED EYE) has come aboard to write the screenplay for a live-action feature adaptation of GOOSEBUMPS for Columbia. I AM LEGEND’s Neal Moritz is producing through his Original Film banner with Deborah Forte of Scholastic Entertainment.

    {jcomments on}



    Read more »
  • Unrated trailer for “HATCHET II”

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 14:43:51 by Allan Dart

    The sequel is hitting theaters unrated October 1 at select AMC theaters. Take a look at this clip of Victor Crowley’s sanguinary slaughters after the jump.

    IGN landed the trailer. Here’s the synopsis for the film:

    “Adam Green’s HATCHET II picks up at the exact moment that 2006’s HATCHET ends, wherein the quiet but hot-tempered Marybeth (Danielle Harris) is in a small boat in the Louisiana swamps, screaming for her life as she tries to free herself from the clutches of the deformed, swamp-dwelling killer Victor Crowley (Kane Hodder). Crowley has murdered Marybeth’s family and other fellow vacationers who had come together on a tourist excursion in the swamplands outside of New Orleans. 

    Marybeth escapes from Crowley and manages to make it back to civilization, where she once again encounters voodoo shop proprietor Reverend Zombie (Tony Todd), who had helped to arrange Marybeth and company’s earlier, ill-fated tour of the area. To help Marybeth and also serve his own secret agenda, Reverend Zombie recruits a hardened pack of hunters to head back into the swamp to seek revenge on Victor Crowley.”

    {jcomments on}

    Read more »
  • “INSIDIOUS” (TIFF Film Review)

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 05:28:26 by Chris Alexander

    As a lifelong horror-film enthusiast, I am forever chasing the dragon for the almighty fright. As you age and the divides between fantasy and reality become sadly concrete, it’s very difficult to totally suspend your disbelief and immerse yourself in the supernatural, to have films about “things” from the ether affect you. But oh, how you want them to.

    Having just exited a Toronto International Film Festival screening of director/editor James Wan’s latest straight-up genre film, INSIDIOUS, feeling weak in the knees yet exhilarated, I’m overjoyed to report that Wan, once again working from a script by SAW partner Leigh Whannell, did it. He got me. He brought me back to that sweet, shuddery dark place I cowered in as a kid, where anything was possible, when I believed in the monster in the freaking closet or under the bed and when I was afraid to fall asleep, because I might get trapped in one of those abstract recurring nightmares that jolted me awake in the dead of night with tears in my eyes and my heart pounding in my tiny chest. The ones that, when the day came, made me glad of it—and I would then go and draw the “things” I saw in my sleep, tell people about them and try to find others who had similar experiences.

    Which is why I’m now sitting in a café, clacking away at my laptop and feverishly trying to belch out a review of the film. I want horror fans to know that there is a picture out there that genuinely cares about craft, that desires to give you those old-fashioned spectral scares, to shake your spine and terrify you, but still ensure that—when the lights come up—you walk out inspired, not battered down by the terror on screen. INSIDIOUS is that film, a work of pure Gothic imagination and wonky dread. It’s like entering one of those rickety carnival haunted-house rides that whip you around, that trot out the “things” that scream bells in your ears and reveal some new dark horror around every whiplash-inducing turn…

    OK, I’ll slow down. The plot.

    Real-deal actors Rose Byrne from 28 WEEKS LATER and HARD CANDY’s Patrick Wilson—it always helps to have good actors anchoring a phantasmagoria like this—star as a lovely middle-class couple who move their three children into a beautiful old detached Victorian home to start a new life. As mom vainly attempts to work on her music compositions while minding her infant daughter, her middle child has an accident in the attic and falls into a mysterious coma. Months pass, and not a single medical professional can determine why this darling little boy refuses to wake up. And yet slowly, surely, “things” start to appear. Ghosts. Monsters. Bumps and screams in the night. Harsh whispers on the baby monitor. Bloody handprints on the bedsheets. Driven past the point of comfort by these unexplained phenomena, the family moves house—only to discover that the “things” have followed them…

    To reveal more would be to kill the midsection hiccup that turns INSIDIOUS from an elegant, serious-minded, creepy-as-all-hell ghost story into a very strange, eccentric POLTERGEIST-by-way-of-Roman-Polanski supernatural drama, and then into a full-blown Mario Bava soaked spookshow freak-out. Wan has sculpted an immaculate, imaginative and completely unpretentious genre work that delivers the goods in an offbeat, unique way—but of course, that’s to be expected. SAW was familiar yet original, an amalgam of classic pulp and contemporary tech. Same with the underrated DEAD SILENCE and the even more underrated vigilante epic DEATH SENTENCE. With INSIDIOUS, I can now proudly proclaim James Wan to be a major master of horror. An old-world craftsman who lets sound and music (right from the opening credits, we’re not only watching the film but listening to it) propel his prowling camerawork and meticulously timed jump scares. The man seems to love what he does, and that passion for the macabre drifted through the theater like the relentless dry-ice mist that smothers the film’s last reel.

    Sure, there are a few narrative glitches and a couple of stumbles of silly dialogue, but Leigh Whannell’s script is otherwise sound. And with a visual and aural palette this rich and a tone this terrifying, as a horror fan (many of whom are, let’s face it, more than a bit jaded), you must allow yourself to overlook those trivial flaws.

    I’ll leave you with this: there was a moment in INSIDIOUS where—I swear to God—my blood chilled. I felt it. I breathed in deep and my damn blood turned cold. And I honestly cannot remember when this has ever happened to me.

    {jcomments on}

    Read more »
  • “THE WARD” (TIFF Film Review)

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 05:22:49 by Adam Nayman

    The best evidence that THE WARD (which premiered this week at the Toronto International Film Festival) was directed by John Carpenter is that his name is above the title. It’s certainly not on the screen; working from a maladroit script by Sean and Michael Rasmussen, Carpenter—who hasn’t made a feature since 2001’s deliriously silly genre mashup GHOSTS OF MARS—directs like a journeyman rather than an auteur.

    It just doesn’t seem like his heart is in this haunted-asylum story, which stars Amber Heard as a disturbed young woman admitted into a psychiatric hospital after burning down a stranger’s home for no apparent reason. No prizes for guessing that the motives for this supremely photogenic act of arson will be unraveled over the film’s duration.

    The clichés just keep on coming: Heard’s new digs are staffed by nasty nurses (of both genders) and presided over by an obviously sleazy head psychiatrist (Jared Harris); the other inmates comprise a cross-section of troubled-girl types (Meryl Streep’s daughter Mamie Gummer is the most ostentatiously bugged-out); and, as in virtually every horror movie produced since 2000, there’s a long-haired, wraith-like female apparition that spends her time popping into frame like Andy Samberg in an SNL Digital Short (except that her appearances aren’t funny on purpose).

    I’m not trying to be nasty to Carpenter, whose relegation to the Hollywood margins around the mid-’80s was undeserved, and who has the talent to pull off memorable horror on a relative shoestring (see 1994’s Lovecraftian pastiche IN THE MOUTH OF MADNESS, with its great Sam Neill performance and handful of sharp, honest scares). The problem with THE WARD is not so much its lack of style as the fact that the director doesn’t seem to have much interest in the material: not in the plight of his female characters, whose ensemble interactions are strained even as their individual personalities are admirably vivid; not in the institutional environment, which feels borrowed from any number of snake-pit dramas; and certainly not in what ends up being the movie’s theme/organizing gimmick, which I will not spoil here but which really could have used a hambone like Donald Pleasance to explicate with the right level of campy conviction. (The reveal, when it comes, is one of the worst-handled aspects of the film).

    There are surely worse horror movies coming out these days than THE WARD—but considering the context of its creation, I can’t think of one that’s more disappointing.

    {jcomments on}


    Read more »
  • “BEST WORST MOVIE” DVD/digital release details

    Originally posted on 2010-09-16 04:35:47 by

    After a successful tour of numerous festivals and theatrical bookings over the past two years, BEST WORST MOVIE is coming home. Michael Paul Stephenson’s documentary about the creation of TROLL 2 will be available on DVD and other digital platforms November 16.

    New Video will be releasing the movie under its Docurama Films banner, allowing more bad-movie fans to view Stephenson’s chronicle of his experiences as the child star of Claudio Fragasso’s notorious non-sequel. Via interviews with Fragasso and most of TROLL 2’s cast (most notably star/dentist George Hardy), and footage of the movie’s nationwide revival screenings nearly two decades after its video debut, he focuses on how a movie he once regarded as an embarrassment turned into a cult favorite. The disc will include the following extras:

    • Over an hour of deleted scenes and interviews

    • Fan contributions, including music videos and mashup trailers

    • Filmmaker Q&A with Creative Screenwriting magazine

    • A “provocative message” from TROLL 2’s Goblin Queen, Deborah Reed

    Retail price is $19.95. TROLL 2 itself will not be included, but it is being given its solo DVD and Blu-ray debuts by MGM/Fox Home Entertainment October 5. See our review of BEST WORST MOVIE here and Stephenson’s early comments about the DVD supplements here. You can find BEST WORST MOVIE’s official website here and Facebook page here.

    {jcomments on}


    Read more »
  • Werner Herzog Raises “MY SON”

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 21:14:08 by Chris Alexander

    German art-house sensation Werner Herzog has long been linked to the horror genre, and not just because of his brilliant, moving and eerie 1979 remake of the landmark vampire film NOSFERATU. Rather, like Roman Polanski and David Lynch, Herzog’s work almost always veers into the darker recesses of the human mind, detailing with natural, beautiful observational aesthetics the conflicts between people and themselves and, perhaps even more profoundly, with the apathy of nature itself.

    Think of the grandiose descent into obsession in AGUIRRE, THE WRATH OF GOD or the equally glorious downward spiral of FITZCARRALDO, both starring the late Klaus Kinski, who over the span of five pictures graced Herzog’s films as the ultimate madman. Or even the recent Nicolas Cage melodrama BAD LIEUTENANT: PORT OF CALL NEW ORLEANS, which sees the actor channeling Kinski as his title character flamboyantly loses a battle with substance addiction.

    But back on the Lynch tip: Herzog’s latest release is the psychological horror film MY SON, MY SON, WHAT HAVE YE DONE, co-executive-produced by Lynch and out this week on DVD from First Look (see our review here). A typically weird, hypnotic and music-fueled mood piece (loosely based on a true story), it stars BUG’s Michael Shannon as a young man who’s addicted to his mother (Lynch regular Grace Zabriskie) and becoming increasingly unhinged. The cast is rounded out by such oddball thesps as Brad Dourif, Udo Kier, Willem Dafoe and Chloe Sevigny, but make no mistake…this is clearly the world of Werner Herzog, and it’s his unique rhythms that make the film so fascinating. Fango caught up with the iconic (and very funny) artist to discuss this strange and beautiful piece of dark work.

    FANGORIA: The fact that two of the most influential contemporary surrealists have made a film together is truly cause for celebration. Can you tell us a bit about how this unholy union came to pass?

    WERNER HERZOG: It’s not as much of a collaboration as fans might expect, as far as working on a screenplay or co-directing is concerned. David and I know and love and respect each other’s work, and have for a long time. We have always had loose discussions about working together. One day I was at his place and we were discussing these big Hollywood films with exploding budgets, and I said we should make films with great stories and the best of actors, but with contained budgets. That we should go back to our roots. Lynch asked if I had a project in mind and I said yes, a dormant one that I had written 12 years earlier. He was so enthusiastic about it, and we both had a feeling we should go ahead.

    But he never showed up on the set, and only saw footage when he finally saw the finished film. He was some sort of—how should I say this?—a positive stumbling block for me. He brought the project to life by sheer enthusiasm.

    FANG: So were you consciously tipping your hat to Lynch in the film?

    HERZOG: Yes, absolutely, in a few ways. The presence of Grace is my homage to David, but let’s face it—she’s a great actress, and perfect for this part.

    FANG: Speaking of great—and eccentric—actors, you put Udo Kier and Brad Dourif in the same film. Remarkable…

    HERZOG: Udo was perfect for the role and he’s a wonderful actor, and Brad has been in several of my films. Michael Shannon was barely known when I hired him—there was no Academy Award nomination [for REVOLUTIONARY ROAD] yet—but even then it was obvious that this man was one of the greatest actors in the world working today. But putting larger-than-life actors such as Dafoe, Dourif and Shannon together…you have to embed them with the right chemistry.

    FANG: The movie is filled with those trademark scenes of yours where characters stand still in frame while odd things happen around them. I’m thinking here of that oddly beautiful sequence involving Tomas Mendez’s gentle song “Cucurrucucu Paloma”—you always use music in such interesting ways.

    HERZOG: Well, let’s face it, Pedro Almodóvar used the song very beautifully as well in his film TALK TO HER. I stumbled across it first when I saw that film, but it had been in several other movies before that. In mine, I employed it to exemplify a kind of surrealism…the stillness of the characters, as the tiniest midget in the world stands on tallest tree stump. The characters stare at the camera but do not move. That’s a motif in the film, that time and purpose come to a standstill.

    FANG: You’re also known for your documentary work, and yet your narrative fictions always blur that line between reality and fantasy; ultimately, it’s hard to properly distinguish the two. Is there a defining difference between your docus and your features?

    HERZOG: Well, when you say “documentary”…I define it differently. Most of my documentaries are feature films in disguise. Because I really direct the documentaries, I invent things for effect. I have to be cautious when I say that, because I never mean to mislead, but rather to intensify and crystallize a deeper truth that underlies the facts.

    FANG: You’re being interviewed by FANGORIA for a reason, and that’s because MY SON, MY SON has been labeled by some as a horror film. Is this your take on the picture?

    HERZOG: I always wanted to make a horror film, but not one where you’re coming at the audience with a bloody ax. MY SON is a kind of horror film in that it’s subversive, and you can never really figure out why it’s scary. When Shannon places a basketball in a tree, it’s scary because you don’t know why he’s doing this; his mind and motives are unclear to us. I believe this film is my most careful and disciplined narration, and my followers recognize it as one of my very best films.

    FANG: There’s a slow burn to MY SON that makes it ideal for multiple viewings. Most of your work improves and gains strength the longer it ages, and I’m wondering if this longevity is something you have in mind when making your movies.

    HERZOG: No, you’re not allowed to. You’re just involved in day-to-day work, the scramble of making a film; you’re not into thinking about posterity. Let me say that I do have the feeling that no matter what the trends are, MY SON is independent of trends; I believe it will outlast many other films released at the same time.

    {jcomments on}


    Read more »
  • “HATCHET II” clip: Tony Todd is rounding up a hunting party!

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 21:09:00 by Allan Dart

    In a new sneak peek at the eagerly awaited sequel HATCHET II, Tony Todd’s character, Reverend Zombie, speaks to a group of locals about heading into the swamp to kill Victor Crowley. Click past the jump to give it a look!

    Movie Jungle posted the clip from HATCHET II, which opens October 1 and also stars Danielle Harris, Kane Hodder, Parry Shen (playing the twin brother of the character he essayed in the first film) and Tom Holland. Click here to see Dark Sky Films’ special AMC unrated and uncut release venues, and pick up Fango #297 (on sale this month) for part one of our exclusive in-depth interview with writer/director Adam Green.

    allowfullscreen=”true” src=”http://www.moviejungle.com/flashplayer/flowplayer.commercial-3.0.7.swf”>

    {jcomments on}


    Read more »
  • “CRONOS” Criterion DVD/Blu release date, cover art & details!

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 19:01:13 by Samuel Zimmerman

    The highly anticipated Criterion Collection release of Guillermo del Toro’s 1993 film CRONOS has finally got a date! Hit the jump to check out the cover art and all the details!

    The film will hit both DVD and Blu-Ray December 7.

    Here’s Criterion’s synopsis: “Guillermo del Toro made an auspicious, audacious feature debut with CRONOS, a highly unorthodox tale about the seductiveness of the idea of immortality. Kindly antiques dealer Jesús Gris (Federico Luppi of del Toro’s THE DEVIL’S BACKBONE) happens upon an ancient golden device in the shape of a scarab, and soon finds himself possessor and victim of its sinister, addictive powers, as well as the target of a mysterious, crude American named Angel (a delightfully deranged Ron Perlman of HELLBOY fame). Featuring marvelous special makeup effects and the unforgettably haunting imagery for which del Toro has become world-renowned, Cronos, is a visually rich and emotionally captivating dark fantasy.”

    Special features include:

    • New, restored high-definition digital transfer, supervised and approved by director Guillermo del Toro and cinematographer Guillermo Navarro, including optional audio with the film’s original Spanish-language voice-over introduction as well as DTS-HD Master Audio on the Blu-ray edition

    • Two audio commentaries, one featuring del Toro and the other producers Arthur H. Gorson and Bertha Navarro and coproducer Alejandro Springall

    • GEOMETRIA, an unreleased 1987 short horror film by del Toro, finished by the director in 2010, plus a new video interview with him

    • Welcome to Bleak House, a video tour by del Toro of his office, featuring his collectibles and personal work

    • New video interviews with del Toro, Navarro, and actor Ron Perlman

    • Video interview with actor Federico Luppi

    • Stills gallery

    • Trailer

    • New and improved English subtitle translation, approved by del Toro

    • PLUS: A booklet featuring an essay by film critic/Fango scribe Maitland McDonagh and excerpts from del Toro’s notes for the film






    {jcomments on}



    Read more »
  • Exclusive “OPPONENT” Art

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 18:17:29 by Tony Timpone

    Those busy B-movie meisters at Connecticut’s Synthetic Cinema International, makers of PREDATOR ISLAND, ASSAULT OF THE SASQUATCH (due October 19 on DVD) and WEREWOLF: THE DEVIL’S HOUND, are wrapping up postproduction on their latest effort, a comedic sci-fi horror flick called OPPONENT. Producer Andrew Gernhard shared with Fango the locally produced movie’s first poster art. See below the jump.

    Director Colin Theys, who previously helmed Synthetic’s BANSHEE!!!, gave Fango the skinny on OPPONENT’s wacky plot: “An alien ship crashes into a junkyard, and its hillbilly owners decide to offer a cash prize for exterminating their new pest,” he says. “OPPONENT is the story of who shows up and the insanity that ensues when they take on their extraterrestrial visitor and each other.”

    Regarding the status of the film, “OPPONENT has turned out better than any of us hoped,” Theys says. “It’s easily our best movie yet and a really wild ride. I can’t wait to get the finished product in front of an audience. We’ve been getting really positive feedback on the clips we’ve shown so far.”

    “We don’t have a trailer yet, because we are still burning away at the final edit of the film,” adds Gernhard. “So many effects for an indie production! We want to make sure the trailer, of course, gets OPPONENT’s best-of-the-best shots and sequences. However, the movie will have its first public screening during the Silk City Flick Fest in Connecticut, October 7-10. It’s not a premiere but an out-of-competition/preview screening of the movie. That night the audience will not be viewing the final-final version, but pretty darn close.” 

    Written by BANSHEE!!!’s John Doolan, OPPONENT stars THEY LIVE’s Roddy Piper (pictured) and Syfy movie regular Jeremy London (BA’AL, BASILISK: THE SERPENT KING, THE TERMINATORS, WOLVESBAYNE, etc.). Synthetic Cinema has it’s own YouTube channel (http://www.youtube.com/syntheticcinema), where the company’s “newest/latest” videos on the browser’s right side feature a bunch of ASSAULT OF THE SASQUATCH teaser spots recently shot for Syfy sister station Chiller. 

    {jcomments on}

    Read more »
  • Two new “LET ME IN” clips

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 18:02:50 by Samuel Zimmerman

    Overture has released a couple of new clips from Matt Reeves’ quite good LET ME IN (his English language remake of LET THE RIGHT ONE IN). Have a look at them below! 

    Here’s the official synopsis: “Chloë Grace Moretz (Hit Girl from KICK-ASS) stars as Abby, a mysterious 12-year-old girl, who moves next door to Owen (Kodi Smit-McPhee, THE ROAD). Owen is a social outcast who is viciously bullied at school and in his loneliness, forms a profound bond with his new neighbor. Owen can’t help noticing that Abby is like no one he has ever met before.  As a string of grisly murders occupy the town, Owen has to confront the reality that this seemingly innocent girl is really a savage vampire.

    “LET ME IN, a haunting and provocative thriller written and directed by filmmaker Matt Reeves (CLOVERFIELD) and produced by legendary British horror brand Hammer Films, is based on the best-selling Swedish novel LAT DEN RAT KOMMA (LET THE RIGHT ONE IN) by John Ajvide Lindqvist, and the highly-acclaimed film of the same name.”

    LET ME IN releases October 1. For more on the film, you can read our review right here and pick up Fango #297 (on sale this month) for our exclusive interview with Reeves. 

    {mov}FishHead_MED_Are you involved in some kind of cul{/mov}


    {jcomments on}


    Read more »
  • Daniel Stamm to direct “REINCARNATE”

    Originally posted on 2010-09-15 17:53:56 by Allan Dart

    THE LAST EXORCISM helmer is going behind the camera for the next film in M. Night Shyamalan’s Night Chronicles series.

    According to Deadline, Stamm will direct the film, which was scripted by Paul Grellong and BURIED’s Chris Sparling. The announcement is timely, considering that DEVIL (the first movie from Night Chronicles) is coming out this weekend. REINCARNATE involves a jury haunted by supernatural forces that hold the key to the murder case they’re deliberating. Production is set to begin in 2011. See LAST EXORCISM article in Fango #296.

    {jcomments on}



    Read more »
Back to Top